Region Forums: States or Regions?

[Michael]

Do you think it would be best to go by States or Regions? East Coast, North East, West, etc. Which do you prefer?

 

[Lipek]

Regions, there is not enough members to set the subgroups for each state (if that's what you're asking this for)

 

[MarkW]

I agree, regions. Most states wouldn't have enough members and the section would probably be wasted.

 

[Robert OB 33/48]

Iam in for Regions as well. As, I think, you like to go world wide, you have Regions in europe, Asia, Australia and Africa. If you have all kinds of countries there, it would make a mess.
So, I am in for Regions.

 

[S4SQTCH]

Regions, there is not enough members to set the subgroups for each state (if that's what you're asking this for)

This makes the most sense right now. Maybe as the user base grows state sub-groups could be created if there is enough demand in that particular state.

 

[murps]

I like regions but based off of the population of members in the area. Ex, CA has been split into 3 regions, north central, southern.

 

[toxicity_27]

I agree with regions. There's not enough activity in most of the states to warrant them having their own section.

 

[Michael]

You guys are awesome. Thank you for the feedback! Keep it coming, but this is looking conclusive. A good project this week.

M

 

[Tim N Michele Davis]

Regions gets my vote too

 

[jkxranger]

I think regions are a good idea,

 

[Byron Eby]

Although I cast towards regions, I am waiting for someone to break the ice with a vote for state....

 

[ShawnR]

Regions please. Someone can post something state specific within their region if needed.

 

[IronPercheron]

I cast regions because it will mean more interaction and give the section a good chance.

As big as texas is youd think we would have plenty of roof for overlanding. But i have a hard time down here, i will be traveling to other regions....

 

[Michael]

I think that pretty much decides it. It unanimous. I'll be making this change soon.