Region Forums: States or Regions? | OVERLAND BOUND COMMUNITY

Region Forums: States or Regions?

  • Hi Guest, you may choose a LIGHT or DARK theme that works best for you with the "Style Chooser" button at the bottom left on this page!
  • HTML tutorial

Do you prefer Region Forums by State or Region?

  • Regions

    Votes: 17 100.0%
  • States

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    17

Lipek

Rank V
Member

Pathfinder I

1,918
Regions, there is not enough members to set the subgroups for each state (if that's what you're asking this for)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael

MarkW

Rank V
Member

Advocate II

2,566
Member #

773

I agree, regions. Most states wouldn't have enough members and the section would probably be wasted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael

Robert OB 33/48

Mid Europe Region Director
Founder 500
Member
Supporter

Explorer I

4,560
Gaanderen
First Name
Robert
Last Name
Keim
Member #

0033

Iam in for Regions as well. As, I think, you like to go world wide, you have Regions in europe, Asia, Australia and Africa. If you have all kinds of countries there, it would make a mess.
So, I am in for Regions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael

murps

Rank V
Member

Advocate II

2,309
Denver, CO, USA
First Name
d
Last Name
m
Member #

0711

I like regions but based off of the population of members in the area. Ex, CA has been split into 3 regions, north central, southern.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael

toxicity_27

US MidWest Region Member Rep
Member

Member II

3,278
Minnesota
Member #

0656

I agree with regions. There's not enough activity in most of the states to warrant them having their own section.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael

IronPercheron

Rank VI
Member
Supporter +

Pathfinder I

3,346
Sweeny Texas
Member #

0990

I cast regions because it will mean more interaction and give the section a good chance.

As big as texas is youd think we would have plenty of roof for overlanding. But i have a hard time down here, i will be traveling to other regions....
 
  • Like
Reactions: ShawnR