I feel like we are arguing about which flavor of ice-cream is better. We all like ice cream, right?
Influencer I
I feel like we are arguing about which flavor of ice-cream is better. We all like ice cream, right?
Member III
16986
In NM complete concealment is illegal except in your house or auto where it is and always has been the law. I don't know how all the sheriffs for every county handle concealment but my county sheriff says as long as the side arm can be seen, not total exposure, he is fine with that. He is the one who gave our CC license test . Supposedly Colorado honors NM CC holders license in Colorado as well as Ariz, not sure about Texas, but being on the border I CC in Texas@Lanlubber just a quick question.. not pointing fingers or poking a person in the eye. You say that I wont know 99% of the time you are armed OC? If a jacket or coat is long enough to drap over that firearm or a untucked shirt...isnt that concealment? Also with out a permit that is concealing a handgun. Not sure what the laws are in New Mexico. Colorado it has to be in plain view or it becomes concealment. You put a jacket on it gets tucked behind the firearm. Untucked shirt is tucked behind the firearm.
Cops open carry because they have to, that uniform comes off. The gun goes under a shirt 9 times out of ten. The term sheepdog gets thrown around alot. But a protector in sheep’s clothing..When the element of surprise disrupts the thought process of a bad guy you have the upper hand. Falls under your situational awareness. Its not all about guns. You’ve got to be a thinker first and training is more than just a trigger pull punching holes in a target. The oh I open carry because its my right...good for you! do you put in the time train, not just for the shooting but before you need to use that firearm. How about after. You have a life taker. Do you have anything to save a life? Same goes with the ccw holder. Its not the OC or CC its that mindset. Were all here for that same reason. Just the thought process has to be the same.
Pathfinder III
Being a Canadian, I"m glad I live in Canada. I've never felt threatened enough to think a gun would help. I've been in situations where not having a weapon diffused a bad situation. And I've honestly never heard a good story about anyone saving the day with a concealed, or open carry weapon. Heck in the UK most policemen don't carry a gun.
It takes far bigger balls to not carry than to carry.
There are thousands of stories of overlanders getting thru sticky situations with people skills, diplomacy, negotiation, personality. There is no need for a gun.... a gun only escalates a bed situation.
But I'll admit, I'm biased living in Canada.
Well, also being a Canadian, and a licensed gun owner I could take a little exception to your claim on the size of my balls. But we all need to laugh at ourselves every now and then so I'm all good on you balls vs gun vs non-gun comparisons. Having said that, as I mentioned I'm also a very proud Canuck and a gun owner. I never, ever travel or camp in our back country without one. Have I needed one yet? No, also haven't needed the fire extinguisher, but I carry that too (you know, just in case). I imagine you may be surprised at the number of trucks you pass going down a random logging road in Canada that have a rifle in them. It's also an amusing thing to consider that as a legal and licensed gun owner in Canada I am part of a group of citizens that are more law-abiding than those that are not. Yet somehow it us that are pointed at, mocked for being gun owners (back to the balls vs gun vs no-gun thing again), considered a threat to our society, and are forced over and over again to defend our rights by those who as a group are much more likely to, and have commited a crime than we have or ever will. But what do I know, I'm just a quiet Canadian gun owner minding my own business out wandering in the wilderness.Being a Canadian, I"m glad I live in Canada. I've never felt threatened enough to think a gun would help. I've been in situations where not having a weapon diffused a bad situation. And I've honestly never heard a good story about anyone saving the day with a concealed, or open carry weapon. Heck in the UK most policemen don't carry a gun.
It takes far bigger balls to not carry than to carry.
There are thousands of stories of overlanders getting thru sticky situations with people skills, diplomacy, negotiation, personality. There is no need for a gun.... a gun only escalates a bed situation.
But I'll admit, I'm biased living in Canada.
Member III
16986
Well, also being a Canadian, and a licensed gun owner I could take a little exception to your claim on the size of my balls. But we all need to laugh at ourselves every now and then so I'm all good on you balls vs gun vs non-gun comparisons. Having said that, as I mentioned I'm also a very proud Canuck and a gun owner. I never, ever travel or camp in our back country without one. Have I needed one yet? No, also haven't needed the fire extinguisher, but I carry that too (you know, just in case). I imagine you may be surprised at the number of trucks you pass going down a random logging road in Canada that have a rifle in them. It's also an amusing thing to consider that as a legal and licensed gun owner in Canada I am part of a group of citizens that are more law-abiding than those that are not. Yet somehow it us that are pointed at, mocked for being gun owners (back to the balls vs gun vs no-gun thing again), considered a threat to our society, and are forced over and over again to defend our rights by those who as a group are much more likely to, and have commited a crime than we have or ever will. But what do I know, I'm just a quiet Canadian gun owner minding my own business out wandering in the wilderness.
Off-Road Ranger I
20389
I use a .44 Mag revolver most of the time outside. I do have other pistols in smaller calibers, but bears are BIG animals. So are wild boar when you're further south than here. At best, the .44 is marginal for those animals, but I'm in hopes of at least getting them off of or away from me. Overkill and fewer rounds than a more appropriate weapon for other threats, but the animals have been the most prevalent.Being in Idaho do you run into a lot of wolves? Im sure you don’t run into the average bear up there ether. 45-70 that will put a hurting on whats down range and your shoulder! What pistol caliber do you like to use? I know alot of my friends that are in the back country up in montana like the ten mil, I run my 9 mil pretty hot but wildlife isnt my first concern.
Member III
16986
Someone asked me one time if I could only have one gun, what would it be. I always said a Ruger long barrel 44 mag. In my old age I think it would be a Tausus Long barrel Judge Magnum 410/45, because of the versatility.I use a .44 Mag revolver most of the time outside. I do have other pistols in smaller calibers, but bears are BIG animals. So are wild boar when you're further south than here. At best, the .44 is marginal for those animals, but I'm in hopes of at least getting them off of or away from me. Overkill and fewer rounds than a more appropriate weapon for other threats, but the animals have been the most prevalent.
~ Edited NAME CALLING NOT ALLOWED ON THIS FORUM~ imagine that, if someone robs a liquor store the police should be looking for unarmed suspects. I never realized the drug wars, murders and violence in Kelowna and Surrey were fueled by guys without guns. You should be on the lecture circuit enlightening our police forces.and are forced over and over again to defend our rights by those who as a group are much more likely to, and have commited a crime than we have or ever will.
Most of us are more concerned with the nightly murders in cities between gangs.I would think all Canadians would be concerned enough to have a firearm for protection.
Member III
16986
Wow, I never realized how stupid some gun owners are, imagine that, if someone robs a liquor store the police should be looking for unarmed suspects. I never realized the drug wars, murders and violence in Kelowna and Surrey were fueled by guys without guns. You should be on the lecture circuit enlightening our police forces.
Member III
16986
Most of us are more concerned with the nightly murders in cities between gangs.
But I doubt many gun owners are willing to pull the trigger early, the gun is just a distraction. I'm more concerned with the guy in a Las Vegas hotel room and his arsenal of bump stop guns. 2 people on a remote road vs 40? in a downtown square, I know where I'm voting.
Pathfinder III
I get that some things might be different in Canada, but in the States, for the most part, if you truly feel a gun doesn’t help, no one is making you carry one.I mostly think a gun escalates any situation. Peaceful resolutions to conflict are easier when no guns are present.
My work takes me into some remote agricultural locations where BC Bud is the product. A few times the directions have been vague and I've stopped for directions. Drive up a strange driveway and you likely meet a guy with a rifle protecting his crop. But it has never been an issue to get directions. They always check my vehicle and I know if they saw a rifle the tension would increase.
In 60 years, I have never felt a gun would help.
Personal insults regarding my level of stupidity aside, individuals that commit crimes with a firearm are not gun owners.... they are criminals. The furthest thing from a legal licensed gun owner in Canada. You don't want to own a firearm, that's ok by me. You don't want me to own firearms, well thats where we start having a problem.Wow, I never realized how stupid some gun owners are, imagine that, if someone robs a liquor store the police should be looking for unarmed suspects. I never realized the drug wars, murders and violence in Kelowna and Surrey were fueled by guys without guns. You should be on the lecture circuit enlightening our police forces.
That said, I live in a community where forestry is the top employer and yes, several guys do keep a rifle in the truck, but mostly so they won't miss the opportunity to kill some game. Being avid hunters the rifle has a specific purpose, they usually laugh when anyone suggests it is there for self defense. They have big enough balls to handle them selves without a gun.
Member III
16986
I mostly think a gun escalates any situation. Peaceful resolutions to conflict are easier when no guns are present.
My work takes me into some remote agricultural locations where BC Bud is the product. A few times the directions have been vague and I've stopped for directions. Drive up a strange driveway and you likely meet a guy with a rifle protecting his crop. But it never been an issue to get directions. They always check my vehicle and I know if they saw a rifle the tension would increase.
In 60 years, I have never felt a gun would help.
Off-Road Ranger I
Being a Canadian, I"m glad I live in Canada. I've never felt threatened enough to think a gun would help. I've been in situations where not having a weapon diffused a bad situation. And I've honestly never heard a good story about anyone saving the day with a concealed, or open carry weapon. Heck in the UK most policemen don't carry a gun.
It takes far bigger balls to not carry than to carry.
There are thousands of stories of overlanders getting thru sticky situations with people skills, diplomacy, negotiation, personality. There is no need for a gun.... a gun only escalates a bed situation.
But I'll admit, I'm biased living in Canada.