People ask me this question all the time. What is overlanding?
I've done my best to answer the question. I've even written my own article. I've taken the time to speak with many folks who have made their own incredible overland journeys to try and understand what it is that we do and how best to explain it to others.
I really believe that this article nails it, and that it is well worth a read.
I'd love to hear the thoughts of this community after reading the article and to discuss it.
Article: What is overlanding?
I read this article last night, and have to be honest... it did rub me the wrong way. I understand the point that they’re trying to make... and the distinctions they were trying to point out, but in the world of intent vs. perception, it did come across as... I don’t know if I’d go so far as to say arrogant or elitist... but it kind of came off as a way of saying... no, no, you can’t be included because you haven’t (fill in the blank).
While I agree, the market has taken ahold of the term itself and turned it an industry... statements and definitions like this do create a tier system (which does imply that being an overlander is a club that 99% of us can’t claim to belong to... does that sound elitist?). Again, intent vs. perception.
Definitions do change. And dialects exist. I would argue that the term “4x4 touring”, which is the definition that likely the majority of us belong to, may be widely accepted in countries like South Africa, Australia and England... but in the United States is not. The term “overlanding” here is synonymous with “4x4 touring”.
Some of us do not have the luxury of time, the freedom of a mobile job or the finances to literally walk away from everything for months on end. But i would say the distinction is whether this makes someone a “full-timer” or that someone is on an “expedition”.
As someone who has crossed international borders while living in Europe (where borders are not a big deal), Central America where borders are heavily armed to someone who has crossed a border into combat, where death or permanent injury was a possibility... the accepted risk in crossing an international boundary varies widely. The level of danger a person is willing to accept is personal and can range from low risk to a calculated risk to a stupid risk. Should this define whether a person is an overlander? I don’t think so.
I think as societies are trying to move beyond divisive language, this micro-defining or re-defining of a term widely used is not what is needed in this community. I think this is a bad look. Just wish that this wouldn’t have come from such a highly respected organization within the community.