• Guest, we will be conducting site maintenance August 4th and some downtime is expected. At this time Rally Point and the Member Map will also become an app-only feature for long-term security and stability. A few days after this maintenance, a major upgrade revision to the forum site will occur.
  • HTML tutorial

How likely is satellite communication in the upcoming iPhone 13?

MazeVX

MazeVX

Rank VI
Launch Member

Influencer II

Seems to be very unlikely... Even though the used chipset might technically support the needed frequency bands, it doesn't mean that it is used or even activated.

Maybe they will have a "pro" version than can use satellite communication.

Having a powerful chipset and not using it is quite typical, for example the GPS chipsets are often capable of doing much more than they are allowed to, because the common user does not need a full feature GPS with high accuracy, same as the satellite coms, 99% will never need it...
 
Hogan

Hogan

Rank V
Member

Advocate I

Matt Hixson said:
Yeah, I intend to agree with most of that. If it does happen though I think it'd be more likely that Apple would have chosen Starlink.
Click to expand...
Well, Starlink is a totally different kind of satellite communications service. It doesn't compete with the services the chipset supports that Apple may end up using. Starlink is for satellite internet access from fixed locations, whereas satellite comms via services like Globalstar (the one mentioned in the article linked in this thread), Iridium, and Inmarsat would be utilized for voice/data comms from mobile devices.

The reason Globalstar was mentioned as being likely is because that is the service that Qualcomm helped start as a joint venture and it's the Qualcomm chipset, not Apple's own chipset, that would support that kind of communication. Apple has been using Qualcomm chipsets for comms for years.

I think it would be great to have satellite comms support in a mainstream mobile phone, but I think it's unlikely that it will happen here if only for the fact that I don't see how a suitable satellite antenna would be able to fit inside the body of an iPhone. Additionally, enabling satellite comms would be a huge battery drain when there's poor or no signal coverage. Anyone with a Garmin inReach will be able to tell you how quickly the battery drains when it keeps trying to sync.

It's just not feasible, IMO.
 
Matt Hixson

Matt Hixson

Rank V
Member

Member I

DRAX said:
Well, Starlink is a totally different kind of satellite communications service. It doesn't compete with the services the chipset supports that Apple may end up using. Starlink is for satellite internet access from fixed locations, whereas satellite comms via services like Globalstar (the one mentioned in the article linked in this thread), Iridium, and Inmarsat would be utilized for voice/data comms from mobile devices.

The reason Globalstar was mentioned as being likely is because that is the service that Qualcomm helped start as a joint venture and it's the Qualcomm chipset, not Apple's own chipset, that would support that kind of communication. Apple has been using Qualcomm chipsets for comms for years.

I think it would be great to have satellite comms support in a mainstream mobile phone, but I think it's unlikely that it will happen here if only for the fact that I don't see how a suitable satellite antenna would be able to fit inside the body of an iPhone. Additionally, enabling satellite comms would be a huge battery drain when there's poor or no signal coverage. Anyone with a Garmin inReach will be able to tell you how quickly the battery drains when it keeps trying to sync.

It's just not feasible, IMO.
Click to expand...
Right. I'm thinking that the rumors of having satellite comms may be correct, and the chipset wrong. Considering how Apple likes to do things I can see an Apple commercial with someone Facetiming with Grandma from their hike in the wilds of the Olympic Peninsula. This would be in line with exactly what Starlink was built for. This is all absolute wild speculation, of course. But I guess we're now on the record. :)
 
M

Mr. McPickle

Rank II
Member

Contributor III

It'll happen. Text-based emergency communications only, at least at first. Could be a good substitute for Garmin InReach.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top